Content provided by Reine Boni rboni@afnet.net
[updated August 22, 2002]
|
Figure 1: Illustrative Conceptual Net Negotiations Model |
|
|
Key Internet Diffusion Milestones
|
|||||||||
|
|
Initial Internet access |
ISP licensed |
Leased-lines on market |
2nd ISP |
2nd Inter. Circuit |
National Switch |
Decent. of IT Policy DM |
Foreign invest-ment |
Regulation |
VOIP |
Duration |
1990 |
1996 |
2000 |
1999 |
2004 |
|
1997 |
1997 |
1997 |
En cours |
|
Actors |
.International actors .Research sector .Leland project |
.Africa-on-line
|
.Afripa Telecom .Prestige Telecom . Intelcom |
.Aviso (CI-Telecom) .Globe access .Afnet . |
.GVT .ATCI .CTCI .CI-Telecom .Afripa Telecom .Prestige telecom |
|
. GVT . Private sector . International actors |
.GVT .France Telecom . Us investors .Canada investors (Telecel International, Prestige Canada) |
.GVT .ATCI .CTCI |
.Business Centers . Private sector . Leased lines providers .CI-Telecom .ATCI |
|
Issues |
Positive (acceptance) |
Positive (Acceptance) |
Positive (acceptance) |
Positive (acceptance) |
Negative |
|
Privatization of the historical operator CITELCOM, with a one-time 7-year monopoly for domestic wireline services.
|
France Telecom won
|
. A lot of licences delivered . Sometimes Unfair |
Only Ci-Telecom is authorized until 2004 |
|
Primary Impediment |
None |
None |
None |
None |
None |
|
None |
Politics |
Politics |
.Politics .CI-Telecom |
|
Secondary Impediment |
None |
None |
None |
None |
None |
|
None |
CI-Telecom |
Politics |
. CI-Telecom |
|
Urgency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contentiousness |
Low |
Low |
High |
|
|
|
High |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Transparency |
High |
High |
High |
High |
|
|
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
|
Perceived Acceptance |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
High |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
Perceived Fairness |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|
|
Low |
No |
No |
|
Table 1: Internet status in RCI
|
ISP |
Numbers subscribers |
Number of Modems |
Lines of access |
Band-width of the access to the backbone |
Ratio Modem/subscribers |
|
Africa-On- Line |
2720 |
212 |
212 |
256 (nl) 512/500 Kbit/s (Vsat) |
14,7 |
|
Globe Access |
3000 |
154 |
154 |
256 (nl) 512/500 Kbit/s (Vsat) |
9,7 |
|
Afnet |
2000 |
60 |
60 |
0 Kb (nl) 2/4 Mbit/s |
10,2 |
|
Aviso |
7000 |
366 |
366 |
128 Kb (nl) 2 Mbit/s |
13,5 |
|
Total |
14 720 |
|
990 |
7280 |
|
NB : 1Mbit=1000Kbit
Total Outbound bandwidth in Kbps in 2002= 256 (nl)+512 (Globe access)+512 (aol) +4000 (Afnet) +2000 (Aviso) = 7280 Kbit/s
nl: nœud Leland
(Table drawn from the working document of the seminar for the installation of a directing diagram of the NTIC in RCI)
The customer distribution for 1999, 2000 and 2002 is displayed below:
|
ISPs |
Number of Clients 1999 |
Number of Clients 2000 |
Number of Clients 2002 |
AVISO |
2400 |
3100 |
7000 |
|
Africa-on-line |
2000 |
2800 |
2720 |
|
Globe Access |
1250 |
2500 |
3000 |
|
Afnet |
600 |
N/A |
2000 |
|
Comete |
150 |
Merged |
|
Total 6400 9000 14 720
% Growth 40% 63%
Internet Infrastructures:
The Leland node is a USAID grant to Côte d'Ivoire that is managed by CI-Telecom. It aimed to create a favorable environnement for access to information technologies infrastructure so as to promote things like the Internet. In its initial phase, 128 Kb/s access link was provided from MCI in the US. The USAID subsidy lasted 3 years at 80% the first year, 65% the second and 25% the third. The fourth year is entirely supported by CI-Telecom. The Leland node can support 15 Internet services providers at 64 Kbit/s.
Privatization of CI-Telecom :
Côte d'Ivoire had taken an option of liberalization of the sector. Indeed, until 1995, three successive plans of development (Plan Telecom I, II, III) had been engaged to improve quality of service of telecommunications and in particular its accessibility in Côte d'Ivoire. By 1997, the outlined objectives had not from being reached. The government of Côte d'Ivoire therefore undertook a complete reform of the sector as follows:
· Installation of a new liberally inspired Telecommunications code;
· Privatization of the historical operator CITELCOM, with a one-time 7-year monopoly for domestic wireline services;
· And, finally, opening of competition to mobile telephony, the public pay phone, the data transmission services and access to Internet.
The privatization of CI-Telecom was done in an environment of adversity. The government was contested by many. They complained that France Telecom did not have the best offer. Most of the complaints come from Ivorians associated to others foreign investors. The complaints emphasize on the weigh of the French Government.
CIDCM Home |
NTN Home |
Ivory Coast |
Rwanda |
South Africa |
Tanzania
Send comments to jbailey@cidcm.umd.edu
Copyright 2002, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland